anggi ratna's blog
Selasa, 27 Oktober 2015
Kamis, 15 Oktober 2015
Rabu, 14 Oktober 2015
INTEGRITY
Group 2 :
1.
Dian Fihastuti
2.
John Adiguna
3.
Murny Wanti
Situmorang
4.
Rachmalia
Marlina
5.
Ratna Anggi
Pratiwi
6.
Rhani Rachmanda
Integrity is
the quality of being honest and having strong moral principles, moral
uprightness. It is generally a personal choice to uphold oneself to
consistently moral and ethical standards.
In ethics,
integrity is regarded by many people as the honesty
and truthfulness or accuracy of one's actions. Integrity
can stand in opposition to hypocrisy, in that judging with the standards
of integrity involves regarding internal consistency as a virtue, and suggests
that parties holding within themselves apparently conflicting values should
account for the discrepancy or alter their beliefs.
The
word integrity evolved from the Latin adjective integer,
meaning whole or complete. In this context, integrity is
the inner sense of "wholeness" deriving from qualities such
as honesty and consistency of character. As such, one may judge
that others "have integrity" to the extent that they act according to
the values, beliefs and principles they claim to hold.
A value
system's abstraction depth and range of applicable interaction may
also function as significant factors in identifying integrity due to their
congruence or lack of congruence with observation. A value system may evolve in
a while, while retaining integrity if those who espouse the values account
for and resolve inconsistencies.
In ethics when
discussing behavior and morality, an individual is said to
possess the virtue of integrity if the individual's actions are based upon an
internally consistent framework of principles. These principles should
uniformly adhere to sound logical axioms or postulates. One can
describe a person as having ethical integrity to the extent that the
individual's actions, beliefs, methods, measures and principles all derive from
a single core group
of values. An individual must therefore be flexible and willing to adjust these
values in order to maintain consistency when these values are challenged, such
as when an expected test result fails to be congruent with all observed
outcomes. Because such flexibility is a form of accountability, it is
regarded as a moral responsibility as well as a virtue.
An
individual's value system provides a framework within which
the individual acts in ways which are consistent and expected. Integrity can be
seen as the state or condition of having such a framework, and acting
congruently within the given framework.
One essential aspect of a consistent
framework is its avoidance of any unwarranted (arbitrary) exceptions for a
particular person or group — especially the person or group that holds the
framework. In law, this principle of universal application requires that even
those in positions of official power be subject to the same laws as pertain to
their fellow citizens. In personal ethics, this principle requires that one
should not act according to any rule that one would not wish to see universally
followed.
The concept of integrity implies
a wholeness, a comprehensive corpus of beliefs, often referred to as
a worldview. This concept of wholeness emphasizes honesty andauthenticity, requiring that one act
at all times in accordance with the individual's chosen worldview.
Conclusion
as
an accountant who has the professional ethics, Integrity is an element of character
that underlie the emergence of professional recognition. Integrity is the
underlying quality of the public trust and is a benchmark for members in
examining the decision.
Integrity
requires a member to, being honest and forthright without sacrificing secret
service recipients. Service and public confidence should not be defeated by
personal gain. Integrity may receive an unintentional error and an honest
difference of opinion, but does not accept the principle of cheating or
negation.
Rabu, 24 Juni 2015
MISSPELLING WORDS
Haftware =>
Hardware
No Sinyal => No
Signal
Spiker =>
Speaker
Kifet => Keypad,
dll
Belive
=> Believe
Cervice =>
Service
Acesoris =>
Accessories
Secon => Second
Welcom =>
Welcome
Turist =>
Tourist
Spik => Speak
Inglish =>
English
S. Tea => Ice
Tea
Fruty => Fruity
Joe Tea => Joy
Tea
Coco-Cola =>
Coca Cola
Tes In Propertis
=> Fit and Proper Test
Sumber :
Senin, 27 April 2015
QUESTION
TAG
Question
tag adalah pertanyaan pendek yang ditambahkan di akhir
pernyataan (declarative sentence) untuk menanyakan informasi atau meminta.
1. Negative
Sentence, Positive Question Tag
·
Ahmad didn’t
come late, did he?
(Ahmad tidak datang terlambat kan?)
·
The man isn’t
stingy, is he?
(Pria tersebut tidak pelit kan?)
·
You haven’t
finished your homework, have you?
(Kamu belum menyelesaikan PR-mu kan?)
·
They won’t
attend the seminar, will they?
(Mereka tidak akan menghadiri seminar kan?)
2. Positive Sentence,
Negative Question Tag
·
Ahmad came late,
didn’t he?
(Ahmad datang terlambat kan?)
·
The man is
stingy, isn’t he?
(Pria tsb pelit kan?)
·
You have
finished your homework, haven’t you?
(Kamu telah menyelesaikan PR-mu kan?)
·
They will attend
the seminar, won’t they?
(Mereka akan menghadiri seminar kan?)
Sumber :
CAUSATIVE
VERB
Causative Verb adalah kata kerja yang digunakan untuk memerintah
orang lain. Memerintah orang lain biasanya menggunakan kata order/command
(memerintahkan).
Tapi dalam causative verb menggunakan kata kerja Get yang umumnya diartikan mendapatkan,
Have yang biasa diartikan
memiliki/telah, dan Make yang biasa
diartikan membuat.
1. Active
Sentence.
Masing-masing causative verb mempunyai grammarnya
sendiri:
Have/Make
Rumus: Subject + Have/Has + Infinitive/V1.
Contoh:
My teacher make me do my home work
(guru saya memerintahkan saya untuk mengerjakan PR)
She has me come to her house right now.
(dia menyuruh saya untuk datang ke rumahnya sekarang
juga)
Let
Rumus: Let + Objek + Infinitive/V1.
Contoh:
Never let her go, or you will regret forever.
(Jangan biarkan dia pergi atau kau akan menyesal
selamanya).
Get
Rumus: Subject + Get + O + to Infinitive/V1.
Contoh:
I get you to like this explanation.
(aku menyuruhmu to meng-like penjelasan ini)
2. Passive
Sentence.
Rumus causative dalam bentuk passive rumusnya sama.
Hanya let saja yang tidak memiliki bentuk passive.
Rumus: S + Have/Make/Get + O + V3.
Have
She has her car fixed
(dia menyuruh seseorang agar mobilnya diperbaiki).
I have the speaker loaded.
(aku minta speakernya dikeraskan).
Make
I make this house cleaned.
(saya minta (kepada seseorang) agar rumah ini
dibersihkan).
Alfonso makes John killed.
(Alfonso menyuruh (seseorang) agar John dibunuh).
Get
Do you get your clothes washed?
(apakah kamu menyuruh bajumu dicuci).
Sandy gets her hair cut.
(Sandy minta agar rambutnya dipotong).
Sumber :
DETERMINER
Determiner adalah kata yang diletakkan di depan kata benda
(noun) yang fungsinya adalah untuk menjelaskan kata benda (noun) tersebut.
Yang termasuk dalam kategori atau kelompok determiners
adalah sebagai berikut:
1.
Articles (the,
a, an)
·
I bought a novel
yesterday
(Saya membeli sebuah novel kemarin)
·
She has a car
(Dia memiliki mobil)
2.
Demonstratives
(this, that, these, those)
·
That house is
mine.
(Rumah itu milik saya)
·
I'd like to buy
those cakes.
(Saya mau membeli kue-kue itu)
3.
Possessives (my,
your, his, her, its, our, their)
·
Her house is
big.
(Rumahnya besar)
·
She is waiting
for my husband.
(Dia sedang menunggu suami saya)
4.
Quantifiers (a
few, a little, much, many, a lot of, most, some, any, enough, etc.)
·
I don't have
much money.
(Saya tidak punya banyak uang)
·
She has a lot of
books at home.
(Dia punya banyak buku di rumahnya)
5.
Numbers (one,
ten, thirty, etc.)
·
I have one wife.
(Saya punya 1 istri)
·
She has three
children.
(Dia punya tiga anak)
6.
Distributives
(all, both, half, either, neither, each, every)
·
Both of my
friends are smart
(Semua teman-temanku pintar)
·
Both of them are
my student
(Mereka semua adalah muridku )
7.
Difference words
(other, another)
·
She has another
pen
(Dia punya pulpen yang lain)
·
There’s another
opinion
(Ada pendapat yang lain)
8.
Question words
(which, what, whose)
·
Which one is
better ?
(Mana yang lebih baik ?)
·
Whose book is
this ?
(Buku siapa ini ?)
Sumber :
Langganan:
Postingan (Atom)